Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Attorneys

» Loans And The Credit Crunch
I’m sure that most of you have been following the credit crunch news. Yesterday the Fed once again lowered rates, but not to the expectations of most of Wall Street. The current credit crunch in my opinion will make the 80’s farm savings and loans crisis look innocent. Bail outs of large [...]

» Estate Planning and Boston's Freedom Trail

Last week my family visited Boston for a little spring break R&R (is it really spring break when the temp barely breaks 50? better than snow, I suppose).

I'd never been to the city before, and we had a nice time visiting friends and seeing the sights along the Freedom Trail. Surprisingly, a couple of estate planning issues impacted the makeup of the city. The following quotes are from the nice walking guide entitled The Complete Guide to Boston's Freedom Trail, by Charles Bahne:

1. "The [Massachusetts] State House stands on land once owned by John Hancock.... Hancock was the first person to sign the Declaration of Independence.... Hancock's elegant mansion stood on what is now the west lawn of the State House. Hancock wished to give his home to the state, for use as a governor's mansion, but he died before he could sign his will. Year later, his heirs offered to sell the old house to the state, but the price was considered too high. Much to the dismay of all Bostonians, the Hancock mansion was demolished in 1863." (page 8) Ah, the irony of one of the world's most famous "signers" failing to sign his Will.

2. Faneuil Hall is "Boston's town meeting-hall [] where the colonists first dared to speak publicly against British rule.... The building was a gift to the town from Peter Faneuil, 'the topmost merchant in all the town'.... Peter Faneuil inherited his fortune from his uncle Andrew, a prosperous merchant whose ships called at ports around the Atlantic. But Andrew's bequest was subject to one unusual provision: like his uncle, Peter had to remain a bachelor. If he ever married, he would forfeit the money!" (pages 30-31) Peter Faneuil was known around Boston as "the jolly bachelor," which is also a name he gave one of his ships. These days, a "no marriage" provision would possibly be declared void as against public policy.

» Pleading Requirements in Will Contests, and Why Litigation Is So Expensive

Clients often ask me, "why is probate litigation so expensive?" The main reason is that the law tends to behave like an unruly beast. Some questions posed to me are easy to answer -- if you want to know the requirements for executing a valid Will in Illinois, I can give them to you. But other questions are much more difficult to answer.

Take, for instance, pleading requirements for a Will contest. Most Will contests include allegations of lack of testamentary capacity (the person who signed the Will didn't know what he or she was doing) and undue influence (someone "forced" the person who signed the Will to do it). As you might imagine, there's a lot of proof required to win a Will contest -- that's as it should be. But what about getting in the door, and being allowed to prove your case through discovery, etc.? The first step in a Will contest is the filing of a petition. The second step in almost every Will contest is for the other side to file a motion to dismiss the petition, on the grounds that it "failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted."

There is no magic book to turn to in order to find out whether a petition will survive a motion to dismiss. Instead, attorneys have to look to caselaw:

Lack of Testamentary Capacity

Two very old cases -- American Bible Society v. Price and Anlicker v. Brethorst -- suggest that pleadings for lack of testamentary capacity don't have to be very in-depth. But then there's this curious Estate of Sutera case from the 1st District in 1990. It seems to suggest that conclusory statements are insufficient, but it's hard to tell. On the one hand, a very well-known book on Illinois probate states that Sutera does not apply to the issue of testamentary capacity generally, but applies only in cases where the petition includes allegations of an "insane delusion." At least one subsequent court case implies the same thing. But Sutera never mentions the phrase "insane delusion"!

That being said, my experience in court has been that judges still view American Bible Society and Anlicker as setting forth the law on pleading lack of testamentary capacity. But I suppose it depends in large part on how the attorneys frame their arguments, and the judge's take on the caselaw. It is, however, an attorney's job to make sure he or she understands and can argue for or against any of the cases that may come up at the hearing on this issue. And reading and understanding cases takes a LOT of time.

Undue Influence

Undue influence requires more in-depth pleading, but there appear to be (again, "appear to be," since there's no answer set in stone) two ways to approach it:

1. You need to make a "specific recital of the manner in which the free will of the testator was impaired." OR

2. You need to show that the person you are accusing of undue influence had a fiduciary relationship with the person who signed the Will (aka the Testator), that the Testator depended on the person and reposed trust in the person, and that the person "prepared or procured" the Will.

Of course, no case says the above, and clearly indicates that you have two paths to take in proving undue influence for motion to dismiss purposes. Again, this is something of which the petitioning attorney must convince the judge.

»  Uncovering Hidden Assets
Your spouse could be hiding assets in offshore accounts or in a seemingly benign charitable foundation. Here's how to find out.

» Merrill ARS customers to get money in a year