Estate Planning Attorneys Parcel Return Service : Probate & Elder Law Attorneys in Parcel Return Service, DC

Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Attorneys

 

Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Parcel Return Service, District of Columbia

Parcel Return Service Estate Planning & Probate Attorneys

  • Home »
  • District of Columbia » Parcel Return Service Estate Planning Attorneys, Probate Attorneys & Elder Law Attorneys »

Results for: estate planning attorneys Parcel Return Service. Browse listings to find an Elder Law or Probate Lawyer in Parcel Return Service, DC.




Steffan & Associates, P.C.

TEL (703) (703) 691-4810 |  Fairfax, VA

John D. Steffan, born in up-state New York, obtained his Master's Degree and Juris Doctor Degree from the University of Tennessee. There he was an associate editor of the Law Review and was awarded fi...(more)



Other Parcel Return Service, District of Columbia Estate Planning & Probate Law Firms (Basic Listings)
No other estate planning & probate law firm listings found.



ESTATE PLANNING, PROBATE & ELDER LAW NEWS

» If I Ran the Cook County Probate Court

Cook County has a pretty major backup in the probate area -- four judges now handle all decedent's estates cases. That's a lot, considering that they handle new cases as well as ones that are dragging on from prior years. As a result, the timeframe for opening an estate has expanded. If I file a petition right now, I may not be able to get a court date for another 4 (or 5 or 6) weeks. Not to mention the fact that, when you go into court, you typically have to wait for an hour or more to have your case called.

If I ran the Cook County Probate Court, my solution to the above problem would be computer filing of "non-contested" estates. I'd estimate that at least 80% of all probate cases in Cook County are open and shut -- no one is contesting the Will, and everyone just wants the probate process to move along as quickly and easily as possible. In cases like that, I would allow the attorney to file all court papers to open the estate via e-mail (as PDFs). The attorney would have to indicate that the PDFs are true and correct copies of the original papers (which are in the attorney's possession).

Perhaps one additional judge could be hired to handle computer filing (review and issue orders). His or her salary could be paid by a $100 "convenience fee" charged for computer filing. It seems to me that everyone wins:

1. Non-contested estates get processed more quickly and more cheaply (you'd rather pay a $100 convenience fee than pay an attorney to sit around in court for hours at a time at $200 or more per hour).

2. The other judges are freed up to handle the contested estates, which are also processed more quickly and more cheaply.

[added 3/18/08: Another idea, based on my observation of court this morning -- a LOT of court activity involves attorneys asking for routine continuances, which are of course routinely granted. Again, if the parties agree and a judge agrees, why do the attorneys need to sit around in court -- wasting their time and their clients' money -- waiting to be heard? Can't the additional judge mentioned above handle these situations too?]

» Hugo's Cuffs Removed
A U.K. judge has thrown out an order freezing $12 billion in PDVSA assets.

» The Wisdom (or Not) of Non-Compete Contracts
Here are some things to consider before hiring your first salesperson.

» NAVA reports robust fourth quarter

» MMI evolving, chairman says