Estate Planning Attorneys Excelsior : Probate & Elder Law Attorneys in Excelsior, MN

Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Attorneys

 

Estate Planning, Probate & Elder Law Excelsior, Minnesota

Excelsior Estate Planning & Probate Attorneys

  • Home »
  • Minnesota » Excelsior Estate Planning Attorneys, Probate Attorneys & Elder Law Attorneys »

Results for: estate planning attorneys Excelsior. Browse listings to find an Elder Law or Probate Lawyer in Excelsior, MN.




The Molever Law Firm

TEL (763) 595-9292 |  Plymouth, MN

TEL (763) 595-9292 |  Saint Paul, MN

Jeffrey P. Molever has been meeting the legal needs of clients since 1982. Mr. Molever's tax planning experience as a CPA and as an attorney, coupled with his Masters Degree (L.L.M.) in Taxation, hel...(more)



Other Excelsior, Minnesota Estate Planning & Probate Law Firms (Basic Listings)
No other estate planning & probate law firm listings found.



ESTATE PLANNING, PROBATE & ELDER LAW NEWS

» Winstead Congratulates Firm's 46 Texas Super Lawyers

DALLAS,, Sep. 23 -- Winstead PC is proud to announce that 46 of the firm's attorneys have been selected as Texas Super Lawyers by Law & Politics magazine and will be published in the October issue of Texas ...

»  Seven Steps To Saner Savings
Congress just keeps creating new accounts, new rules and new traps.

» Citigroup buys Wachovia's banking unit

» Wills and Trusts With Incorrect Family Information

Here’s a problem that I’ve encountered a couple of times recently: people who intentionally misstate their family situation in their estate planning documents. In both cases, the testator did not list all of his or her children in the section of the Will usually entitled “My Family.” Note that this is different from disinheriting, although that appears to be the purpose behind the exclusion.

Let me give an example:

Testator has four children, Adrian, Betty, Caliope, and David. Testator’s Will says, “I have two children now living, Adrian and Caliope,” and leaves all of testator’s property to “my children who survive me.”

This language raises three problems:

1. Is it effective to disinherit Betty and David? If I represent either of them, I say that the language leaving the property to “my children who survive me” governs, since the testator obviously was incorrect in stating that he had two living children.

2. This language also gives Betty and David a better argument for contesting the Will. Would you say that someone who misstates the number of their children is competent?

3. In some cases, the disinherited children don’t wish to contest the Will. This is the case where the Will was trying to do something the testator wanted to do (cut out two children), but did it incompetently. (The best way to disinherit is to say it specifically.) The issue is that the probate attorney needs to be able to go into court and show the decedent’s family situation to the judge. Next month I will go to court and ask a judge to rule that a decedent had four children, despite the decedent having a Will that says he had only two children. That could create problems.

To expand on this last point, I’m starting to think that heirship should be set forth more explicitly in estate planning documents. Usually I do this roughly, with a section entitled “My Family,” listing spouse and living children. But maybe we should go one step further? I recently had a situation where a decedent died leaving hard-to-pin-down heirs. The decedent was unmarried, and had no children or living parents or siblings. It took quite a bit of time to track down her two heirs (cousins), because the beneficiary/sole heir didn’t really know about the decedent’s family situation. It would have been better to get the heirship information from the decedent during the estate planning process.

»  10 Tips For Working After 50
Companies recognize they need gray-haired types as much as the gray hairs need work.